Comparison
AI video generators compared
The main AI video models compared on strengths, control, and credit cost — and when each is the right pick.
There is no single best video model, which is the main argument for having them all behind one interface. Each leads on something different.
Veo leads on prompt adherence and has the deepest supporting range including 4K upscale. Sora leads on scene coherence over longer shots. Kling leads on character consistency and adds explicit motion control. Seedance leads on input control, with Omni Reference and first-last-frame. Wan leads on cost, at standard tier rather than premium. Hailuo leads on natural motion from a single still. Runway Act Two is alone in doing performance transfer, and Grok Imagine handles longer durations.
The economic point matters as much as the quality one: premium models cost 1.5x. Iterating on Wan at 20 credits a clip and finishing on Veo at 30 costs far less than iterating on Veo throughout, and the composition decisions you are making while iterating transfer between models.
FAQ
AI video generators compared — questions
Which model should I start with?
Wan, for cost, while you settle the prompt and composition. Then re-run the shot you like on Veo, Sora or Kling depending on whether you need prompt accuracy, coherence or character consistency.
Which is cheapest?
The standard-tier models — Wan, LTX, PixVerse, Vidu, Hailuo — at 20 credits for a 5-second clip against 30 for premium.
Can I switch models without redoing my setup?
Yes. All of them sit in the same Video studio and the form re-renders from the selected model's schema.
Keep reading
Related guides
Start generating today
100 free credits on signup — roughly fifty images, or twenty-five voiceovers, or three premium video clips.
No card required.